Dmitry Kakurin wrote:There are far too many highly valuable contributors that have spoken against C++ for me to believe that C++ and C will ever co-exist in the official git repo. Good thing utility classes can be developed on top of the existing C-code, but in a separate repo, and packed into a library. That way, you get some hacking ground for your beloved C++ coderswhile the current git contributors can keep contributing in the language they like best. The C code base is a lot larger and C++ will drop dead pretty fast if it's ever removed or left unmaintained. So much for dinosaurs... Complete and utter BS. It can also stay in C, or get language bindings for Python/Perl/PHP/LUA(?)/whatever, or both. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Andrea Arcangeli | [PATCH 00 of 12] mmu notifier #v13 |
| David Newall | Re: What still uses the block layer? |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Konrad Rzeszutek | [PATCH] Add iSCSI iBFT support (v0.4.5) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Stefan Richter | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Antonio Almeida | HTB accuracy for high speed |
