On Friday 2007 September 07, Junio C Hamano wrote:Can I suggest not calling it git-merge-pack? It makes it look like it's a new merge strategy called "pack"... git-merge-base git-merge-file git-merge-index git-merge-octopus git-merge-one-file git-merge-ours git-merge-recur git-merge-recursive git-merge-resolve git-merge-stupid git-merge-subtree git-merge-tree Andy -- Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET andyparkins@gmail.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 025/196] paride: Convert from class_device to device for block/paride |
| Henrique de Moraes Holschuh | [RFC] rfkill class rework |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 05/37] dccp: Cleanup routines for feature negotiation |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Johann Baudy | Packet mmap: TX RING and zero copy |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
