On 2007-09-05 12:57:22 -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:Thanks. But I guess an even nicer fix would be to make this function return a set in the first place. Hmm. I don't believe I saw t1001 break without this patch (I run the test suite before I push, but I might have made a mistake of course). Does the user's environment leak into the test sandbox? -- Karl Hasselstr
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: init's children list is long and slows reaping children. |
| Kohei KaiGai | [PATCH 0/3] exporting capability name/code pairs (final#2) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 33/37] dccp: Initialisation framework for feature negotiation |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Mark Ryden | Re: Linux Wireless Mini-Summit -- Ottawa -- July 22, 2008 |
