Linus Torvalds, Wed, Sep 05, 2007 09:09:27 +0200:
quoted text
> I personally repack everything way more often than is necessary, and I had 
> kind of assumed that people did it that way, but I was apparently wrong. 
> Comments?

I do it from time to time. Seldom in working repositories, because
they usually come and go before they have a chance to accumulate
enough of loose objects. I do a partial repack (git repack -d) after
every import from p4 repo, because every snapshot of it is an ugly
mess changing files all over the tree. Sometimes, after I merged a big
chunk with the p4 repo and sent it over (the process involves rebase).

It is usually concious decision when to do a repack or gc. The repack
time is seldom a problem: it is fast enough even on windows (and I do
have big repos and binary objects). The gc causes my machines to swap,
though. Some of them heavily, so there my repos stay longer partially
packed. I do use .keep packs for this reason (and because windows or
cygwin or both have more problems with big files the they have with
small).

I used to clone repos with "-s", but quickly stopped after a few
broken histories.  This also tought me to think before running
"git gc" or "git repack -a -d".

On a rare occurance I even use "git repack -a -d -l" and "git
pack-refs" separately.

This was all specific to my day-job. At home, on linux systems I just
run git-gc whenever I please, without even thinking why. It finishes
mostly in less than a minute (the kernel: ~40-50 sec on my P4 2.6GHz, 1Gb).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html