Nix wrote:If you are setting up cron jobs to repack multiple git trees, you are not the kind of novice or casual git user who this proposal would primarily be aimed at. But in any event, since you are doing that, your repos will never accumulate a high enough percentage of loose objects (whatever the threshold is) to trigger the warning and/or automatic launch. So you can continue to operate as before, no difference in behavior, while people who don't know how / want to set up cron jobs will have their repositories cleaned too. git-gc can leave behind a "last completed" timestamp and we can suppress the check for excess loose objects until some minimum amount of time has passed since last git-gc. If that amount is greater than the interval between your cron jobs, you won't even get any (measurable) overhead from the detection to see if the warning is needed. -Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Zhang, Yanmin | AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1 |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
