Jon Smirl wrote:But to what end? We all *know* the impacts: * Excellent performance at what it does now. * Currently zero capability to replace google as the #1 search engine. Since replacing google's db was never, and will never, be the goal of git, what is it you wish to achieve? Seriously, I'm dying to know, so please tell me. If you have already and I'm too daft to understand it, humor me and reiterate :-) -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| monstr | [PATCH 26/60] microblaze_v4: time support |
| Jon Smirl | Re: 463 kernel developers missing! |
| Andrew Morton | Re: x86: 4kstacks default |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jiri Olsa | [PATCHv5 0/2] net: fix race in the receive/select |
