Jon Smirl wrote:But to what end? We all *know* the impacts: * Excellent performance at what it does now. * Currently zero capability to replace google as the #1 search engine. Since replacing google's db was never, and will never, be the goal of git, what is it you wish to achieve? Seriously, I'm dying to know, so please tell me. If you have already and I'm too daft to understand it, humor me and reiterate :-) -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Rafael J. Wysocki | 2.6.28-rc2-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 |
| Dave Hansen | Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages |
| Jesper Juhl | Re: [RFD] Documentation/HOWTO translated into Japanese |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Sander | 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'mems_allowed' (was: Re: 2.6.20-rc4-mm1) |
| Corey Minyard | [PATCH 3/3] Convert the UDP hash lock to RCU |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
