El 27/9/2007, a las 21:22, Junio C Hamano escribió:

quoted text
> What you would want to change is the fallback behaviour for
> unconfigured "remote.<name>.push".  I think it is sensible to
> have an option to make it push only the current branch.  I am
> not sure if it is sensible to make that the default (and
> introduce --matching option to get the current behaviour) at
> this point in 1.5.X series, but from the general usability point
> of view, I would not object to demote 'matching' to optional and
> make 'current only' the default in 1.6.X or later.
>
> Thoughts?

I'd certainly welcome this change for two reasons:

1. It makes the behaviour more conservative (that is, harder to do  
something destructive and irreversible) by using the more limited  
scope by default. If you make a mistake and see that you really meant  
to push all matching branches then you can just do the push again  
with that switch; compare that to the situation now where if you  
accidentally push all matching branches when you only wanted to push  
the current branch then there's no way for you to "unpush".

2. Mental baggage from working with SVK (where "push" means merge  
changes back to the branch the current branch previously branched  
from, and "pull" means merge changes into the current branch from the  
branch you previously branched from). At least for me and I suspect  
for many others the "current only" default in 1.6 or latter would be  
less "surprising" than the current behaviour can be.

Cheers,
Wincent

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html