Nicolas Pitre wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> 
>> Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> 
>>>> To me, the ability to say "HEAD@{35}" (or "HEAD@{650}"...) is not
>>>> fundamental,
>>> Maybe it should?
>>>
>> Why? I'd have no idea where I'd end up. I can't remember exactly what I
>> did to my branch head more than 5 revs (or 15 minutes) ago, and since
>> the reflog provides "subject-by-action" instead of "subject-by-commit"
>> it's, imo, much less usable for recovering lost branch-heads.
> 
> Then, maybe you would be interested by 'git log -g' if 'git reflog' 
> isn't verbose enough for you.
> 

Ah, now this is more like it. I should have known someone would have
come up with something clever like that :)


quoted text
>> Had I only remembered the exact wording in the commit-subject I'd
>> have found it a lot faster with "git-lost-found | grep wording" than
>> I would have if I'd used the reflog from the start.
> 
> Maybe 'git log -g -Swording' then?  Or any other log options you like.
> 

*giggles* It works nicely with git-shortlog too.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html