Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:

quoted text
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> 
>> While I do not think the previous one was hacky at all, this one
>> IS a hack, not meant for inclusion.
> ...
> Sadly, that removal is required for some of the other cases, so it's not 
> like we can remove the remove. But we could *possibly* make things 
> ridiculously much faster by making the remove a lazy thing, and if the 
> next index operation just adds it back in, we wouldn't move things around.

Heh, that makes the two of us.  I have been wanting to revamp or
kill off unpack-trees for quite some time, and after all the
patch you are responding to might be a small first step in the
right direction ;-).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html