On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, David Kastrup wrote:No, it's the same thing. I started out by saying that Texinfo is horrible. It's horrible because it doesn't *buy* you anything. The only thing it buys you (the "info" format) is totally irrelevant, which I tried to explain. AsciiDoc is much nicer. It does everything that Texinfo does for us, and it's readable on its own as plain text, something Texinfo isn't. So by advocating Texinfo, you're advocating something that is OBJECTIVELY WORSE than what we have now. And I tried to explain why, by pointing out that info files (which was the case you tried to push as an advantage) aren't actually an advantage to any normal user. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| David Woodhouse | [PATCH 1/3] firmware: allow firmware files to be built into kernel image |
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Josip Rodin | bnx2_poll panicking kernel |
| Patrick McHardy | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
