I exactly need the functionality that Miles is describing for
the following good reason:
Mac OS X has the notion of a bundle, which is a directory that
contains related files that are fully controlled by the application
that is writing that bundle. The bundle functionality is
directly supported by the OS and most applications save their
data as bundles. For example on Mac OS X, the Openoffice format,
which packs related files in a zip file, would just be a directory
with all related files grouped together (no ZIP archive needed).
So here is what I need: I want to be able to track a directory
with all its contents. The data inside the directory are not
under my control. It's only the directory that matters for me.
Git is already quite good at that because it doesn't need to
place anything inside the opaque directory! Subversion for example
has no chance because it clutters the directory with .svn
directories, which will be removed by the next Save (an
application first creates a new temporary directory, stores
all data there, moves the old directory to a backup location,
and renames the new directory to the final destination only
if no problems occurred).
When I started with git I figured out that
git-ls-files -z --others dir | git-update-index --add -z --stdin
git commit -a
does the job for me. Would
git add dir
git add -u dir
git commit
be equivalent, but restricted to the changes in dir?
Steffen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html