On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:36:29AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:Ah, indeed, I had assumed that it came from cpio (which also uses the -l flag!), but reading the code, it's us. Given that "-l" is now the default, and we silently downgrade to copying anyway, I don't see the point of having any warning at all. Unless, I guess, for those people who are still using "-l" even though it's a noop. -Peff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| FUJITA Tomonori | Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc4 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Artem Bityutskiy | [PATCH 11/44 take 2] [UBI] allocation unit header |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
