On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, David Kastrup wrote:
quoted text
> >
> > You must be kidding. Texinfo is the worst documentation format EVER.
> 
> Oh come on.  It was the first hyperlinked and hierarchical format
> before HTML even existed.

Yes. And it should have died after html took its place.

quoted text
> Actually, a decade ago the Emacs-internal info reader was worse than
> it is now.

Wow. I've used the emacs one, and the stand-alone info one, and both are 
pretty horrid. You're saying that they used to be _worse_?

(Admittedly, my GNU emacs-fu is very weak. I use an emacs-like editor, but 
it's just an editor, and it's subtly different, so I actually find the 
"real" emacs to be really disturbing on so many levels ;)

quoted text
> [ structure ]
>
> And as opposed to AsciiDoc, there _are_ readers that make use of this
> information.

None that any normal user would want to use. 

The thing is, html does a much better job of all of that, simply because 
there are useful readers. The same, btw, goes for man-pages: even though 
they have no structure at all, just the fact that normal people know how 
to use them, they are actually superior to info pages!

That's something that the FSF seems to have missed in their push for info 
format: a lot of FSF programs have really substandard man-pages, but that 
doesn't mean that people read the info ones _anyway_. Because the readers 
are so disgustingly horrible, plain man-pages are actually much more 
useful, despite the fact that they don't have any cross-referencing etc.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html