Hi,

I'm in the process of setting up a git environment with a number of
shared branches. To avoid putting unnecessary merges into the trunk,
we'd like to normally use rebase when updating private branches. I
wondered if it would be possible to automatically determine the
correct remote branch to rebase against.

The most logical place to do this seemed to be in git-pull, so I
experimented with adding a '--rebase' option, per the (rough) diff
below.

I'm quite new to git, so is this a good strategy?

-Tom


commit 60b7318c2ebb7ee2bd1afb02f1fc925a29e1b214
Author: Tom Clarke <tom@u2i.com>
Date:   Thu Aug 30 14:39:34 2007 +0200

    Added --rebase option to pull

diff --git a/git-pull.sh b/git-pull.sh
index 5e96d1f..233a1d9 100755
--- a/git-pull.sh
+++ b/git-pull.sh
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ cd_to_toplevel
 test -z "$(git ls-files -u)" ||
        die "You are in the middle of a conflicted merge."

-strategy_args= no_summary= no_commit= squash=
+strategy_args= no_summary= no_commit= squash= rebase=false
 while case "$#,$1" in 0) break ;; *,-*) ;; *) break ;; esac
 do
        case "$1" in
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ do
                no_commit=--no-commit ;;
        --sq|--squ|--squa|--squas|--squash)
                squash=--squash ;;
+       --re|--reb|--reba|--rebase)
+               rebase=true ;;
        -s=*|--s=*|--st=*|--str=*|--stra=*|--strat=*|--strate=*|\
                --strateg=*|--strategy=*|\
        -s|--s|--st|--str|--stra|--strat|--strate|--strateg|--strategy)
@@ -119,5 +121,10 @@ then
 fi

 merge_name=$(git fmt-merge-msg <"$GIT_DIR/FETCH_HEAD") || exit
-exec git-merge $no_summary $no_commit $squash $strategy_args \
+if test $rebase != "false"
+then
+    exec git-rebase $strategy_args $merge_head
+else
+    exec git-merge $no_summary $no_commit $squash $strategy_args \
        "$merge_name" HEAD $merge_head
+fi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html