Re: git-svn tags and branches

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Sam Vilain
Date: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 8:49 pm

Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:

Right, but I think the bad practice should be propagated anyway.  It
will affect virtually no-one, and serves to make it the case that even
if such a thing happened, then just fetching the tag gives the expected
behaviour.

However I'd be prepared to accept that perhaps new tags should be made,
eg "tags/svntagname.r1234", to reflect the fact there are there multiple
tags with the same name but different contents.


Coming up with agreed test cases is half (indeed sometimes most of) the
work.


I think it's quite important that this isn't required.

Sam.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: git-svn tags and branches, Giuseppe Bilotta, (Tue Aug 28, 2:37 am)
Re: git-svn tags and branches, Sam Vilain, (Tue Aug 28, 3:49 pm)
Re: git-svn tags and branches, Giuseppe Bilotta, (Tue Aug 28, 4:20 pm)
Re: git-svn tags and branches, Sam Vilain, (Tue Aug 28, 8:49 pm)
Re: git-svn tags and branches, Giuseppe Bilotta, (Wed Aug 29, 1:41 am)
Re: git-svn tags and branches, Andreas Ericsson, (Wed Aug 29, 1:56 am)
Re: git-svn tags and branches, Junio C Hamano, (Wed Aug 29, 1:59 am)
Re: git-svn tags and branches, Giuseppe Bilotta, (Wed Aug 29, 3:53 am)
Re: git-svn tags and branches, Junio C Hamano, (Wed Aug 29, 1:15 pm)
Re: git-svn tags and branches, Giuseppe Bilotta, (Wed Aug 29, 2:06 pm)