On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 01:34:37AM CEST, Linus Torvalds wrote:
My logic for using git+ssh is that this URL really denotes a resource
accessed over the *git* *protocol*, merely _wrapped up_ in ssh session
for the authentication and security. But I admit that your point that
this is just exposing an implementation detail is valid.
I still like the naming git+ssh and think it is logical, but I don't
really care that much (and fail to see why do you *hate* it so
intensively). So I'll sleep on it and if no further compelling positive
argument pops in my head, I'll just change it to ssh. (I don't want to
use the host:path notation because I want to make clear it's ssh and
people need to get their usernames and ssh keys in order before
pushing.)
I've never heard of anybody getting confused by the git+ssh syntax
either, and I honestly can't remember the several people that asked me
not to use it (besides one your mail complaining about it, not even
directed at me). But I may have just forgotten.
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Early to rise and early to bed makes a male healthy and wealthy and dead.
-- James Thurber
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html