Home » Mailing list archives » git » 2007 » August » 11

Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Fernando J. Pereda <ferdy@...>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Cc: moe <moe-git@...>, <git@...>
Subject: Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?
Date: Saturday, August 11, 2007 - 3:02 pm

On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:47:42AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
=20
=20

Just for the record, I tried those patches on a real tree of ~120k files
and ~25k directories, and Git is now _usable_. (The repository was
created from an old checkout of the gentoo-x86 tree).

- ferdy

--=20
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimart=EDn
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED  ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
git and larger trees, not so fast?, moe, (Thu Aug 9, 12:30 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Aug 11, 2:47 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, moe, (Sat Aug 11, 4:06 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, moe, (Wed Aug 22, 8:30 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Fernando J. Pereda, (Sat Aug 11, 3:02 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Aug 11, 4:38 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Fernando J. Pereda, (Sat Aug 11, 4:51 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Aug 11, 6:27 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, David Kastrup, (Sat Aug 11, 7:26 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 10, 3:39 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 1:11 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 1:54 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 1:38 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 2:06 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 2:11 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 4:42 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Sean, (Thu Aug 9, 4:52 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 5:41 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 5:46 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 6:02 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Daniel Barkalow, (Thu Aug 9, 9:42 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 7:38 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 8:44 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 8:51 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 8:57 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 11:48 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 10, 12:07 pm)
Fix "git commit directory/" performance anomaly, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 10, 12:51 pm)
Re: Fix "git commit directory/" performance anomaly, Junio C Hamano, (Fri Aug 10, 2:31 pm)
Re: Fix "git commit directory/" performance anomaly, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 10, 2:56 pm)
Re: Fix "git commit directory/" performance anomaly, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 10, 1:14 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Fri Aug 10, 1:55 am)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 10, 11:49 am)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 8:04 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 5:37 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 2:00 pm)