Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Cc: Sean <seanlkml@...>, moe <moe-git@...>, <git@...>
Date: Friday, August 10, 2007 - 1:55 am

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:


FWIW, moe's script with and without two patches gives these
numbers for me.

      with patches                      without patches
----------------------------------------------------------------
# git init                          | # git init			       
Initialized empty Git repository in | Initialized empty Git repository in  
                                    | 				       
real    0m0.029s                    | real    0m0.004s		       
user    0m0.000s                    | user    0m0.000s		       
sys     0m0.008s                    | sys     0m0.004s		       
# git add .                         | # git add .			       
                                    | 				       
real    0m2.947s                    | real    0m3.038s		       
user    0m0.808s                    | user    0m0.876s		       
sys     0m2.120s                    | sys     0m1.996s		       
# git commit -a                     | # git commit -a		       
                                    | 				       
real    0m4.537s                    | real    0m4.674s		       
user    0m1.980s                    | user    0m1.888s		       
sys     0m2.356s                    | sys     0m2.332s		       
# git status (three times)          | # git status (three times)	       
# On branch master                  | # On branch master		       
nothing to commit (working directory| nothing to commit (working directory 
                                    | 				       
real    0m0.718s                    | real    0m17.323s		       
user    0m0.300s                    | user    0m16.913s		       
sys     0m0.416s                    | sys     0m0.396s		       
# On branch master                  | # On branch master		       
nothing to commit (working directory| nothing to commit (working directory 
                                    | 				       
real    0m0.707s                    | real    0m16.994s		       
user    0m0.312s                    | user    0m16.573s		       
sys     0m0.400s                    | sys     0m0.416s		       
# On branch master                  | # On branch master		       
nothing to commit (working directory| nothing to commit (working directory 
                                    | 				       
real    0m0.720s                    | real    0m18.042s		       
user    0m0.344s                    | user    0m17.633s		       
sys     0m0.376s                    | sys     0m0.408s		       
# git commit (one path)             | # git commit (one path)	       
Created commit 3483df5: expose the t| Created commit ced664f: expose the t 
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1|  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 
                                    | 				       
real    0m3.057s                    | real    0m38.130s		       
user    0m0.888s                    | user    0m37.458s		       
sys     0m0.712s                    | sys     0m0.616s                     
----------------------------------------------------------------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
git and larger trees, not so fast?, moe, (Thu Aug 9, 12:30 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Aug 11, 2:47 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, moe, (Sat Aug 11, 4:06 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, moe, (Wed Aug 22, 8:30 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Fernando J. Pereda, (Sat Aug 11, 3:02 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Aug 11, 4:38 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Fernando J. Pereda, (Sat Aug 11, 4:51 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Aug 11, 6:27 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, David Kastrup, (Sat Aug 11, 7:26 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 10, 3:39 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 1:11 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 1:54 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 1:38 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 2:06 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 2:11 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 4:42 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Sean, (Thu Aug 9, 4:52 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 5:41 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 5:46 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 6:02 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Daniel Barkalow, (Thu Aug 9, 9:42 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 7:38 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 8:44 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 8:51 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 9, 8:57 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 11:48 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 10, 12:07 pm)
Fix "git commit directory/" performance anomaly, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 10, 12:51 pm)
Re: Fix "git commit directory/" performance anomaly, Junio C Hamano, (Fri Aug 10, 2:31 pm)
Re: Fix "git commit directory/" performance anomaly, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 10, 2:56 pm)
Re: Fix "git commit directory/" performance anomaly, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 10, 1:14 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Fri Aug 10, 1:55 am)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 10, 11:49 am)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 8:04 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 5:37 pm)
Re: git and larger trees, not so fast?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Aug 9, 2:00 pm)