Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk> writes:I have my doubts that anybody but git actually has a clue what to snapshot when, and where to place it: don't forget that index manipulation and committing are done at different times, and you need not even commit all of the index. Last time I looked, git tracked the executable bit. For kernel development, this is pretty much what it takes, and with colloborative work, tracking anything but the owner permissions is going to lead to annoying and verbose merge behavior quite a lot. And of the owner permissions, r and w complicate proper handling when unset. But being able to specify other masks for applications other than multi-site colloborative development would likely not hurt. It will also detach the time where the file contents and the permissions get recorded. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Andi Kleen | Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native format. |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: Possible regression in HTB |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
git: | |
