Home » Mailing list archives » git » 2007 » July » 23

Re: git-apply versus git-am

Previous thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] Re: Empty directories... by David Kastrup on Monday, July 23, 2007 - 3:45 am. (1 message)

Next thread: [PATCH] Use Peter J. Weinberger's hash function in xdiff by Marco Costalba on Monday, July 23, 2007 - 7:17 am. (1 message)
[view original message]
From: Sean Kelley <svk.sweng@...>
To: <git@...>
Subject: git-apply versus git-am
Date: Monday, July 23, 2007 - 3:54 am

Why doesn't git-apply include an option for a signoff line like git-am?


git-applymbox /tmp/mbox ~/.signoff


Or am I missing something?  (most likely the case!)


Sean

-
[view original message]
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...>
To: Sean Kelley <svk.sweng@...>
Cc: <git@...>
Subject: Re: git-apply versus git-am
Date: Monday, July 23, 2007 - 4:54 am

applymbox is going away.


-
[view original message]
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...>
Cc: Sean Kelley <svk.sweng@...>, <git@...>
Subject: Re: git-apply versus git-am
Date: Monday, July 23, 2007 - 1:20 pm

That sucks!  I like git-am.  Is there a replacement command that applies a patch and

commits it at the same time?  If I use git-apply on a patch that adds new files, I need to

use git-add on the files before I can commit it.  That's a real pain.


--

Timur Tabi

Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale

-
[view original message]
From: Peter Baumann <waste.manager@...>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...>
Cc: Sean Kelley <svk.sweng@...>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@...>, <git@...>
Subject: Re: git-apply versus git-am
Date: Monday, July 23, 2007 - 1:37 pm

'git am' isn't going away, but as Junio mentioned, 'git applymbox' is.

Those are two *different* programms doing roughly the same, but

'git applymbox' is superceded by 'git am'.


-Peter

-
[view original message]
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@...>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...>
Cc: Sean Kelley <svk.sweng@...>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@...>, <git@...>
Subject: Re: git-apply versus git-am
Date: Monday, July 23, 2007 - 1:34 pm

Hi,


Read it again.  Junio talked about applymbox, not am.


Ciao,

Dscho

-
[view original message]
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@...>
Cc: Sean Kelley <svk.sweng@...>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@...>, <git@...>
Subject: Re: git-apply versus git-am
Date: Monday, July 23, 2007 - 1:37 pm

Sorry, for some reason I thought git-am is just a shortcut for git-applymbox.


--

Timur Tabi

Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale

-
[view original message]
From: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@...>
To: Sean Kelley <svk.sweng@...>
Cc: <git@...>
Subject: Re: git-apply versus git-am
Date: Monday, July 23, 2007 - 4:31 am

git apply is just a safer patch(1). They serve different purpose.

-
Previous thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] Re: Empty directories... by David Kastrup on Monday, July 23, 2007 - 3:45 am. (1 message)

Next thread: [PATCH] Use Peter J. Weinberger's hash function in xdiff by Marco Costalba on Monday, July 23, 2007 - 7:17 am. (1 message)