Re: git-apply versus git-am

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...>, Sean Kelley <svk.sweng@...>, <git@...>
Date: Monday, July 23, 2007 - 1:37 pm

On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:20:40PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:

'git am' isn't going away, but as Junio mentioned, 'git applymbox' is.
Those are two *different* programms doing roughly the same, but
'git applymbox' is superceded by 'git am'.

-Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
git-apply versus git-am, Sean Kelley, (Mon Jul 23, 3:54 am)
Re: git-apply versus git-am, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Jul 23, 4:54 am)
Re: git-apply versus git-am, Timur Tabi, (Mon Jul 23, 1:20 pm)
Re: git-apply versus git-am, Peter Baumann, (Mon Jul 23, 1:37 pm)
Re: git-apply versus git-am, Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Jul 23, 1:34 pm)
Re: git-apply versus git-am, Timur Tabi, (Mon Jul 23, 1:37 pm)
Re: git-apply versus git-am, Alex Riesen, (Mon Jul 23, 4:31 am)