Home » Mailing list archives » git » 2007 » July » 23

Re: git-apply versus git-am

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...>
Cc: Sean Kelley <svk.sweng@...>, <git@...>
Subject: Re: git-apply versus git-am
Date: Monday, July 23, 2007 - 1:20 pm

Junio C Hamano wrote:


That sucks!  I like git-am.  Is there a replacement command that applies a patch and 
commits it at the same time?  If I use git-apply on a patch that adds new files, I need to 
use git-add on the files before I can commit it.  That's a real pain.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
git-apply versus git-am, Sean Kelley, (Mon Jul 23, 3:54 am)
Re: git-apply versus git-am, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Jul 23, 4:54 am)
Re: git-apply versus git-am, Timur Tabi, (Mon Jul 23, 1:20 pm)
Re: git-apply versus git-am, Peter Baumann, (Mon Jul 23, 1:37 pm)
Re: git-apply versus git-am, Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Jul 23, 1:34 pm)
Re: git-apply versus git-am, Timur Tabi, (Mon Jul 23, 1:37 pm)
Re: git-apply versus git-am, Alex Riesen, (Mon Jul 23, 4:31 am)