Re: [PATCH (REVISED)] Add core.editor configuration variable

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <git@...>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@...>, Adam Roben <aroben@...>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@...>
Date: Thursday, July 19, 2007 - 6:48 am

On Thursday 2007 July 19, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

By that argument, why do we bother with subsections at all.  In fact why not 
call the variable "xhxhxjjjll.yqlaoospsp"?

They are meant to help the human remembering it.


That's what I said for pager - since it's already there.  However, since the 
editor isn't already in, it's not a question of _leaving_ it anywhere.  
Better that it goes in the right place when it is first introduced.


So is every other porcelain command - almost by definition, porcelain commands 
are the ones we use.


I don't understand the point you're making here.  Are you saying that we can 
rely on porcelain not to change or the core not to change?  I'm also 
wondering about these "inadvertent" changes that are getting made to git 
core - I've not noticed them before :-)



Andy
-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET
andyparkins@gmail.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH (REVISED)] Add core.editor configuration variable, Brian Gernhardt, (Thu Jul 19, 10:24 am)
Re: [PATCH (REVISED)] Add core.editor configuration variable, Johannes Schindelin, (Thu Jul 19, 6:00 am)
Re: [PATCH (REVISED)] Add core.editor configuration variable, Andy Parkins, (Thu Jul 19, 6:48 am)
Re: [PATCH (REVISED)] Add core.editor configuration variable, Johannes Schindelin, (Thu Jul 19, 7:15 am)