login
Header Space

 
 

Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@...>
Date: Friday, July 13, 2007 - 3:32 pm

On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Paul Mackerras wrote:

That would be beautiful to see, indeed, when you're in the middle of a 
merge. "gitk --merge" already does most of it, but actually seeing the 
diff of the currently merged stuff would be pretty darn cool.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Jul 12, 3:20 pm)
Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?, Paul Mackerras, (Fri Jul 13, 5:55 am)
Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Jul 13, 1:36 pm)
Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?, Paul Mackerras, (Fri Jul 13, 6:09 am)
Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Jul 13, 3:32 pm)
Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Jul 12, 4:43 pm)
Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?, Junio C Hamano, (Thu Jul 12, 4:48 pm)
Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Jul 12, 5:01 pm)
speck-geostationary