login
Login / Register
Header Space

 
 

Home » Mailing list archives » git » 2007 » June » 4

Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binaries too.

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@...>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Cc: Olivier Galibert <galibert@...>, Thomas Glanzmann <thomas@...>, Bryan Childs <godeater@...>, <git@...>
Subject: Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binaries too.
Date: Monday, June 4, 2007 - 6:30 pm

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 02:33:18PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

	It survives because it is well-known.  Everyone expects it to
break.  ocfs2 has an "ALL" branch that is everything we have working,
sort of a "test this bleeding edge" thing.  It gets rebased all the
time, and everyone knows that they can't trust it to update linearly.
Other developers have similar things in their repositories.

Joel

-- 

"What no boss of a programmer can ever understand is that a programmer
 is working when he's staring out of the window"
	- With apologies to Burton Rascoe

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binaries t..., Bryan Childs, (Mon Jun 4, 7:48 am)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jun 4, 11:20 am)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Bryan Childs, (Mon Jun 4, 11:38 am)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Daniel Barkalow, (Mon Jun 4, 7:48 pm)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jun 4, 8:21 pm)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., , (Mon Jun 4, 9:42 pm)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jun 4, 11:58 pm)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Martin Langhoff, (Mon Jun 4, 6:29 pm)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jun 4, 12:23 pm)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Thomas Glanzmann, (Mon Jun 4, 1:57 pm)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jun 4, 4:45 pm)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Olivier Galibert, (Mon Jun 4, 5:21 pm)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Jun 4, 10:56 pm)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jun 4, 5:33 pm)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Joel Becker, (Mon Jun 4, 6:30 pm)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Theodore Tso, (Tue Jun 5, 7:19 am)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Jun 4, 10:58 am)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Theodore Tso, (Mon Jun 4, 9:18 am)
Re: Git Vs. Svn for a project which *must* distribute binari..., Julian Phillips, (Mon Jun 4, 7:56 am)

Mail archive search
Enter your search terms.
Optionally limit your search to a specific mailing list.
advanced
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently 4 users and 943 guests online.

Online users

Syndicate
Syndicate content
© 2007 KernelTrap.  |  Powered by Drupal.  |  Legal statement.
speck-geostationary