I've asked this on IRC a couple times and nobody seemed to have a good answer, so: These two tools seem like they are solving the same general problem using similar approaches. They are both under active development. In what areas is each of them stronger than the other? Why would one choose to use one of them instead of the other? -Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Tim Tassonis | reiser4 for 2.6.27-rc1 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default |
git: | |
| Alex Riesen | Re: question about git-submodule |
| Greg KH | Re: [ANNOUNCE] pg - A patch porcelain for GIT |
| Nicolas Pitre | Re: git-index-pack really does suck.. |
| Bill Lear | Meaning of "fatal: protocol error: bad line length character"? |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Matt | Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences? |
| Marco Peereboom | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| bsd_news | LC_COLLATE and PostgreSQL |
| Eric Sandeen | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| John Stoffel | Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three |
| Al Boldi | Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck |
| Alex Zarochentsev | Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 |
