Re: FFmpeg considering GIT

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jan Hudec
Date: Monday, May 7, 2007 - 10:52 am

On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 22:13:44 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
mit=20
=20
the=20

C/Gtk would be perfectly portable. As would C++/Gtk, Python/Gtk and Perl/Gt=
k.
C++/Qt4 would be perfectly portable as well, so choose whichever you find
easier to work with. For C/C++ they are on par, for Python/Perl/Ruby I think
Gtk has better bindings.


I would actually recommend against Python/Tk, because (tried it) py2exe does
not work seem to work with it, so you couldn't wrap it to easy to install
binary for windows folks. I did not try Python/Gtk, but I expect you might
have better luck with it (it's the Tcl/Tk interpreter that causes problems).

--=20
						 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Michael Niedermayer, (Fri May 4, 6:46 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Andy Parkins, (Fri May 4, 8:53 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Nicolas Pitre, (Fri May 4, 9:40 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Carl Worth, (Fri May 4, 11:17 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Johan Herland, (Fri May 4, 11:25 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Michael Niedermayer, (Fri May 4, 1:24 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 4, 9:15 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Sat May 5, 6:35 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 5, 10:26 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 5, 3:18 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 5, 3:30 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Junio C Hamano, (Sun May 6, 12:49 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Sun May 6, 12:56 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Marco Costalba, (Sun May 6, 1:15 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Sun May 6, 3:19 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Sun May 6, 4:14 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Marco Costalba, (Sun May 6, 5:19 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Sun May 6, 5:33 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Marco Costalba, (Sun May 6, 5:33 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Sun May 6, 5:59 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Sun May 6, 6:03 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Linus Torvalds, (Sun May 6, 9:38 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Paul Mackerras, (Mon May 7, 5:13 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Mon May 7, 5:30 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Johan Herland, (Mon May 7, 5:50 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Alex Riesen, (Mon May 7, 5:56 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Jan Hudec, (Mon May 7, 10:52 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Junio C Hamano, (Mon May 7, 12:10 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, gabor, (Mon May 7, 3:10 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Randal L. Schwartz, (Mon May 7, 4:21 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Shawn O. Pearce, (Mon May 7, 7:03 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Marco Costalba, (Mon May 7, 11:30 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Jeff King, (Tue May 8, 12:26 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Paul Mackerras, (Tue May 8, 9:28 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Marco Costalba, (Tue May 8, 11:38 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Robin Rosenberg, (Wed May 9, 11:17 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Jan Hudec, (Wed May 9, 11:28 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Fredrik Kuivinen, (Wed May 9, 2:09 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Jan Hudec, (Wed May 9, 2:36 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Pavel Roskin, (Wed May 9, 3:30 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Marco Costalba, (Thu May 10, 4:20 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Jan Hudec, (Thu May 10, 9:52 am)