torsdag 03 maj 2007 skrev Martin Langhoff:No idea. I wouldn't try it without distcc and ccache anyway which makes the capabilities of this particular machine less relevant. The kernel 2.6 repo isn't in the same ball park wrt to size. Hacking the kernel is quite fine on this machine and even smaller though the first compile takes some time. Having more is always fun though. Consider another huge project like Eclipse. Similar operations take a loong time (not anywhere near the eons that CVS need, but...) and building Eclipse with 1GB i very reasonable so sheer project size does not per se demand powerful computers. KDE is another huge project that is reasonable to build with 1GB. The first time is somewhat painful, but rebuilding is not. -- robin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Mel Gorman | [PATCH 6/8] x86_64 - Specify amount of kernel memory at boot time |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: Soft-Lockup/Race in networking in 2.6.31-rc1+195 ( possibly?caused by netem) |
