login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <git@...>
Date: Sunday, May 6, 2007 - 2:23 pm

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:


Thanks a lot for the detailed explanations.

Note that I'm not "complaining", but just not understanding something.

(I would actually complain about the documentation not being clear
enough, but I'll try to complain with a contribution instead ;-) I'll
add something to the FAQ on the wiki, but it's down right now).


Well, git's index still tells more than "the content FOOBAR exists,
somewhere". It also "contains", if not "points to", the file name.


Off course, I don't have strong argument against it. The biggest
annoyance is that my fingers are used to "commit -m message", and now
type "commit -a message", but ...

The reason why I'm posting this is that I was wondering whether
"commit -a" not being the default was supposed to be a message like
"you shouln't use it too often".

It seems it isn't. I'll just get used to "commit -a" (and probably
alias it), and discover the actual benefits of the index little by
little.

                                   ^^^
Not sure this was intentional, but your spelling of "as" when used to
talk about CVS seems to reveal something about your state of mind ;-).

Thanks,

-- 
Matthieu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Matthieu Moy, (Sun May 6, 12:10 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Guilhem Bonnefille, (Mon May 7, 7:40 am)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Daniel Barkalow, (Mon May 7, 6:23 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Johannes Schindelin, (Mon May 7, 8:55 am)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Junio C Hamano, (Mon May 7, 3:31 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Linus Torvalds, (Sun May 6, 1:25 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Matthieu Moy, (Sun May 6, 2:23 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Matthieu Moy, (Wed May 9, 1:18 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Martin Langhoff, (Mon May 7, 11:16 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Johannes Schindelin, (Tue May 8, 7:07 am)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 8, 12:45 am)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 9, 11:52 am)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Junio C Hamano, (Wed May 9, 8:31 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Shawn O. Pearce, (Thu May 10, 6:06 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Petr Baudis, (Thu May 10, 6:51 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Steven Grimm, (Wed May 9, 10:27 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 9, 10:39 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Matthieu Moy, (Thu May 10, 4:00 am)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Daniel Barkalow, (Wed May 9, 1:39 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 9, 2:16 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, J. Bruce Fields, (Wed May 9, 1:18 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, J. Bruce Fields, (Wed May 9, 1:29 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Martin Langhoff, (Tue May 8, 1:35 am)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Johannes Schindelin, (Sun May 6, 7:51 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Matthieu Moy, (Mon May 7, 4:02 am)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Johannes Schindelin, (Mon May 7, 7:05 am)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Julian Phillips, (Sun May 6, 6:53 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Shawn O. Pearce, (Mon May 7, 9:41 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Shawn O. Pearce, (Tue May 8, 10:52 am)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Linus Torvalds, (Sun May 6, 3:54 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Johannes Schindelin, (Sun May 6, 12:51 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Matthieu Moy, (Sun May 6, 1:34 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Johannes Schindelin, (Sun May 6, 7:42 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Junio C Hamano, (Sun May 6, 1:43 pm)
Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index, Johannes Schindelin, (Wed May 9, 9:57 am)
Re: [PATCH] git-commit: Reformat log messages provided on co..., Johannes Schindelin, (Wed May 9, 11:01 am)
speck-geostationary