Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, 4 May 2007, Dana How wrote:
> 
> > Most commands accept relative paths,  but this is
> > not true of arguments in ent:path format.  This
> > patch makes all of the following git-show commands
> > work in the git source tree (not just the first):
> >  % cd xdiff
> >  % git-show v1.5.2-rc0:xdiff/xemit.h
> >  % git-show v1.5.2-rc0:./xemit.h
> >  % git-show v1.5.2-rc0:../sha1_name.c
> 
> ACK.

Double ACK.  I'm in complete agreement with every point Dscho has
made in this thread, even if I haven't quoted it.  ;-)

I *really* do not want to see "<tree-ish>:<path>" to mean include
the current prefix, *especially* when a bare repository is involved.

I often either do ad-hoc git-show lines against bare repositories,
or have scripts that depend on this existing absolute path behavior.
I'd like to see those not break.  ;-)

Since "." and ".." should not be valid names in any tree of a Git
repository I think we're OK to say that ":./" and ":../" are to
imply relative to current prefix.  But if we do ":../" then we also
have to do ":../../../../../../.." ;-)

-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html