Re: FFmpeg considering GIT

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Carl Worth <cworth@...>
Cc: <git@...>
Date: Friday, May 4, 2007 - 2:25 pm

On Friday 04 May 2007, Carl Worth wrote:

It's also used in an example in the User Manual (Chapter 1. Git Quick=20
Start -- Exploring history). I was also surprised that it wasn't=20
mentioned in the git-log manual page.


=2E..Johan

=2D-=20
Johan Herland, <johan@herland.net>
www.herland.net
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Michael Niedermayer, (Fri May 4, 9:46 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Carl Worth, (Fri May 4, 2:17 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Sat May 5, 9:35 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Marco Costalba, (Sun May 6, 4:15 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Sun May 6, 7:14 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Marco Costalba, (Sun May 6, 8:19 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Marco Costalba, (Sun May 6, 8:33 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Sun May 6, 8:59 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Pavel Roskin, (Wed May 9, 6:30 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Sun May 6, 9:03 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Sun May 6, 8:33 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 5, 1:26 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Sun May 6, 6:19 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Linus Torvalds, (Sun May 6, 12:38 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Sun May 6, 3:56 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 5, 6:18 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 5, 6:30 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Paul Mackerras, (Mon May 7, 8:13 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Jeff King, (Tue May 8, 3:26 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Shawn O. Pearce, (Mon May 7, 10:03 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Junio C Hamano, (Mon May 7, 3:10 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Jan Hudec, (Mon May 7, 1:52 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, , (Mon May 7, 6:10 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Randal L. Schwartz, (Mon May 7, 7:21 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Alex Riesen, (Mon May 7, 8:56 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Marco Costalba, (Tue May 8, 2:30 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Paul Mackerras, (Wed May 9, 12:28 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Marco Costalba, (Wed May 9, 2:38 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Jan Hudec, (Wed May 9, 2:28 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Fredrik Kuivinen, (Wed May 9, 5:09 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Jan Hudec, (Wed May 9, 5:36 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Marco Costalba, (Thu May 10, 7:20 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Jan Hudec, (Thu May 10, 12:52 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Robin Rosenberg, (Wed May 9, 2:17 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Johan Herland, (Mon May 7, 8:50 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Karl , (Mon May 7, 8:30 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Junio C Hamano, (Sun May 6, 3:49 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Michael Niedermayer, (Fri May 4, 4:24 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 5, 12:15 am)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Johan Herland, (Fri May 4, 2:25 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Nicolas Pitre, (Fri May 4, 12:40 pm)
Re: FFmpeg considering GIT, Andy Parkins, (Fri May 4, 11:53 am)