On 5/2/07, Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com> wrote:
quoted text
> In his reply to my script, Junio correctly pointed out that all this
> fiddling really ought to be happening in git-svn itself; it ought to
> know that you've done a merge and should record that fact directly in
> the metadata for 4' rather than treating it as a single-parent commit.
> If you do the above a zillion times you'll end up with a huge grafts
> file which is not so clean. But as a stopgap measure, this does work
> adequately.

Yes, it's seems just fine. Thanks for the tips.

I'm not aware with the internal Git's features. As grafts seems to be
a quick hack, is it posible to imagine that, after git-svn rewrited 4
in 4', an other tool rewrites (completly) the commit to produce a 4"
with 2 parents?

-- 
Guilhem BONNEFILLE
-=- #UIN: 15146515 JID: guyou@im.apinc.org MSN: guilhem_bonnefille@hotmail.com
-=- mailto:guilhem.bonnefille@gmail.com
-=- http://nathguil.free.fr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html