On 20.5.2007, at 13.01, Alex Riesen wrote:

quoted text
> Timo Sirainen, Sun, May 20, 2007 04:24:29 +0200:
>> So here's my try on starting with something simple. Unlike almost all
>> other string handling libraries, it doesn't allocate the memory
>> dynamically.
>
> Sometimes you _need_ dinamic memory allocation.

It's easy to use the same str_*() functions to implement dynamic  
memory allocation. I think I could have done a bit different naming,  
like maybe:

extern struct string *str_alloc(unsigned int len);
extern void str_append(struct string *str, const char *cstr);

#define static_string(name, size) ..
#define sstr_append(str, cstr) str_append(&(str).string, cstr)


quoted text
>> This makes it really easy to convert existing code to use it. I'm
>> including some example changes in the other patches. Besides making
>> the code safer, it can also make it faster, especially those
>> strcat() replacements.
>
> It is also bigger, heavier on stack and sometimes slower because of
> more function calls involved.

I would hardly call 8 extra bytes on stack heavier. Also if this was  
used everywhere I wouldn't be surprised if it made the code faster,  
because it would remove a lot of overflow checking code so more code  
will fit into L1 cache.