On Tuesday 2007, May 01, Chris Shoemaker wrote:

quoted text
> That's only true when the revision is not specified in the external.
> The repo you track may not do that, but it's not uncommon to do so.

It's been a while since I used subversion, and even longer since I used 
externals - is that a new feature?  I used subversion since before 
version 1.0, so I often missed new features when they arrived. 

quoted text
> And, as I think you're pointing out, it's the only way to get any
> sort of reliable information about the relationship between the
> parent and the external.

Does subversion automatically update that fixed attachment when you 
update the submodule?  I would have found that quite useful back then.

quoted text
> I think it would probably be undesirable for git-svn to attempt to
> convert "floating" externals into well-versioned submodules, since
> they're not even well-versioned in the svn repo.  However, handling
> the "locked-down" externals is quite another thing.

Absolutely.  If the information is available, then git is certainly 
capable of recording it.  It sounds like subversion has a facility I 
didn't know exist, so I've been bad mouthing it more than I should.  Oh 
well :-)



Andy

-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET
andyparkins@gmail.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html