Re: git-svn and local only topic branch

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <git@...>
Cc: Guilhem Bonnefille <guilhem.bonnefille@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 1, 2007 - 2:29 pm

On Tuesday 2007, May 01, Guilhem Bonnefille wrote:


No.  Subversion doesn't do merge tracking.  What you're asking for would 
require that.  While git-svn is good, it cannot give subversion 
abilities it doesn't have.

It's an easy trap to fall into because git makes it so easy that you can 
forget that not everyone else can do it.



Andy
-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET
andyparkins@gmail.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
git-svn and local only topic branch, Guilhem Bonnefille, (Tue May 1, 12:40 pm)
Re: git-svn and local only topic branch, Steven Grimm, (Wed May 2, 3:06 pm)
Re: git-svn and local only topic branch, Guilhem Bonnefille, (Thu May 3, 7:24 am)
Re: git-svn and local only topic branch, Andy Parkins, (Tue May 1, 2:29 pm)
Re: git-svn and local only topic branch, Adam Roben, (Tue May 1, 12:45 pm)
Re: git-svn and local only topic branch, Guilhem Bonnefille, (Tue May 1, 1:30 pm)