On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:

quoted text
> So I tend to think that alternates and shared object directories are
> really for "temporary" stuff, or for *managed* repositories that are at
> git *hosting* sites (eg repo.or.cz), and where there is some other safety
> involved, ie users don't actually access the object directories directly
> in any way.
>
> So I've at least personally come to the conclusion that for a *developer*
> (as opposed to a hosting site!), shared object directories just never make
> sense. The downsides are just too big. Even alternates is something where
> you just need to be fairly careful!

I was actually thinking that hosting sites (and things like gitorrent) would be 
the ones that would get the most benifit from shareing objects. the amount saved 
for any individual developer is probably fairly minor (and the individual 
developer could run a script to look across their objects and hard-link them 
togeather if they care about the space)

David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html