On Apr 11, 2007, at 7:54 PM, Martin Waitz wrote:Why can't can't we extend checkout with an option to look for an enclosing git project, find the gitlink in the index, and check out that commit? That allows you to return to the original state without needing to bother with new special branches. And instead of recording the path in a .gitmodules file, why not a list of git directories we search for the commit? Allows moving of subprojects without suddenly breaking configuration files. When we find the appropriate git dir, we can use a .gitlink file or symlinks to attach the directory to it's repository. I dislike moving git in the direction of enforcing more policy instead of less, and of making it less capable of handling content movement instead of more. ~~ Brian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Artem Bityutskiy | [RFC PATCH 06/26] UBIFS: add superblock and master node |
| Joe Perches | [PATCH 001/148] include/asm-x86/acpi.h: checkpatch cleanups - formatting only |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
git: | |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Christoph Lameter | Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
