Re: Git building is borked

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <git@...>
Date: Thursday, March 8, 2007 - 6:29 am

It is even worse...

Having commented out all mentions of "git-gui" from the main git  
Makefile, I was able to run make and "sudo make install" succesfully  
and now I appear to have a working git.  (-:

But now I put the git-gui mentions back into the Makefile and tried  
again it still fails.  Looking at it closer it actually requires me  
to compile within a checked out git tree, i.e. including the .git  
directory and all its contents!  That seems even weirder than  
requiring git to be installed in the first place...

Best regards,

	Anton

On 8 Mar 2007, at 10:21, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:


-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Git building is borked, Anton Altaparmakov, (Thu Mar 8, 6:21 am)
Re: Git building is borked, Anton Altaparmakov, (Thu Mar 8, 6:29 am)
Re: Git building is borked, Shawn O. Pearce, (Thu Mar 8, 10:55 am)
Re: Git building is borked, Anton Altaparmakov, (Thu Mar 8, 11:10 am)
Re: Git building is borked, Anton Altaparmakov, (Thu Mar 8, 11:07 am)
Re: Git building is borked, Shawn O. Pearce, (Thu Mar 8, 11:13 am)
Re: Git building is borked, Anton Altaparmakov, (Thu Mar 8, 11:19 am)