Re: [RFH] straightening out "read-tree -m"

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Steven Grimm <koreth@...>
Cc: Matthias Lederhofer <matled@...>, <git@...>
Date: Sunday, March 18, 2007 - 8:04 pm

Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com> writes:


You are free to come up with test case, but I have a feeling
that the problem is already well understood (and that is why the
last part of my RFH matters a lot more than the former "case
table").  In short, "read-tree -m" (and unpack-trees) is screwy
in the presense of D/F conflicts.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFH] straightening out "read-tree -m", Junio C Hamano, (Sun Mar 18, 3:25 am)
Re: [RFH] straightening out "read-tree -m", Matthias Lederhofer, (Sun Mar 18, 8:18 am)
Re: [RFH] straightening out "read-tree -m", Junio C Hamano, (Sun Mar 18, 4:23 pm)
Re: [RFH] straightening out "read-tree -m", Steven Grimm, (Sun Mar 18, 7:20 pm)
Re: [RFH] straightening out "read-tree -m", Junio C Hamano, (Sun Mar 18, 8:04 pm)
Re: [RFH] straightening out "read-tree -m", Brian Gernhardt, (Sun Mar 18, 12:06 pm)