On 3/10/07, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
quoted text
> Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de> writes:
>
> > Using Update-existing leads to the client forgetting about the "locally
> > modified" status of the file which can lead to loss of local changes on
> > later updates.
>
> To me, both of these hunks look correct (the first one is clean
> merge, the second one is merge with conflicts).  Ack?

Ack!



m
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html