On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

quoted text
>
> I wonder what we are really trying to address here. Or in other words
> could the original poster maybe tell what Windows IDE's that does
> not handle UNIX files properly?
>
> core git today should not care about CRLF as opposed to LF end-of-line
> as long as the end-of-line is consistent - correct?
>
> So defaulting to autoCRLF in Windows/DOS environments was maybe
> sane 10 years ago but today that seems to be the wrong thing to do.
> For certain project the option could be useful if the tool-set in
> the project *requires* CRLF, but if the toolset like all modern toolset
> supports both CRLF and LF then git better avoid changing end-of-line marker.

I've actually run into grief on this subject with perl scripts within the last 
year (files from windows systems with crlf not working cleanly on a linux system 
with just lf)

this is real, not just historic

David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html