On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 03:49:39PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
ISTM that people are stuck using less than helpful criteria for
judging whether renames are supported. Namely, in effect, they ask:
"Does the user get to do extra work in order to get rename-detection?"
Let me humbly suggest an alternate, two-fold, very practical criteria
that I actually care about as a user:
1) If I edit file A, while another developer renames file A to B, and
I merge my work with his, do I have to clean things up myself, or does
everything Just Work?
2) If I'm browsing the history of some code in a renamed file, does
the history continue through the rename?
By these criteria, git certainly does support renames.
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html