Home » Mailing list archives » git » 2007 » November » 6

Re: git pull opinion

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Aghiles
Subject: Re: git pull opinion
Date: Monday, November 5, 2007 - 11:30 pm

> I respectfully beg to differ.  I think it is entirely reasonable, and

BitKeeper, for example, does a merge with a "dirty" directory.
I am not saying that git should behave the same way but I think
that this argument strengthens the point that it is not a
"centralized repository" mindset.

- Aghiles.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
git pull opinion, Aghiles, (Mon Nov 5, 2:52 pm)
Re: git pull opinion, Alex Riesen, (Mon Nov 5, 3:49 pm)
Re: git pull opinion, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Nov 5, 4:33 pm)
Re: git pull opinion, Miklos Vajna, (Mon Nov 5, 4:40 pm)
Re: git pull opinion, Bill Lear, (Mon Nov 5, 5:36 pm)
Re: git pull opinion, Steven Grimm, (Mon Nov 5, 5:37 pm)
Re: git pull opinion, Pierre Habouzit, (Mon Nov 5, 5:46 pm)
Re: git pull opinion, Andreas Ericsson, (Mon Nov 5, 5:54 pm)
Re: git pull opinion, Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Nov 5, 6:16 pm)
Re: git pull opinion, Aghiles, (Mon Nov 5, 9:04 pm)
Re: git pull opinion, Aghiles, (Mon Nov 5, 9:16 pm)
Re: git pull opinion, Benoit Sigoure, (Mon Nov 5, 10:29 pm)
Re: git pull opinion, Aghiles, (Mon Nov 5, 11:30 pm)
Re: git pull opinion, Ralf Wildenhues, (Tue Nov 6, 12:34 am)
Re: git pull opinion, Alex Riesen, (Tue Nov 6, 12:38 am)
Re: git pull opinion, Alex Riesen, (Tue Nov 6, 12:40 am)
Re: git pull opinion, Aghiles, (Tue Nov 6, 12:45 am)
Re: git pull opinion, Pierre Habouzit, (Tue Nov 6, 1:31 am)
Re: git pull opinion, Pierre Habouzit, (Tue Nov 6, 1:51 am)
Re: git pull opinion, Andreas Ericsson, (Tue Nov 6, 1:59 am)
Re: git pull opinion, Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Nov 6, 4:59 am)
Re: git pull opinion, Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Nov 6, 5:05 am)
Re: git pull opinion, Andreas Ericsson, (Tue Nov 6, 5:08 am)
Re: git pull opinion, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Nov 6, 9:36 am)
Re: git pull opinion, Pascal Obry, (Tue Nov 6, 11:07 am)
Re: git pull opinion, Ralf Wildenhues, (Tue Nov 6, 1:22 pm)
[PATCH] Mark 'git stash [message...]' as deprecated, Brian Downing, (Tue Nov 6, 5:26 pm)
[PATCH] Disable implicit 'save' argument for 'git stash', Brian Downing, (Tue Nov 6, 5:26 pm)
Re: git pull opinion, Uwe , (Wed Nov 7, 12:06 am)
Re: git pull opinion, Pascal Obry, (Wed Nov 7, 12:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] Mark 'git stash [message...]' as deprecated, Johannes Sixt, (Wed Nov 7, 1:00 am)
Re: [PATCH] Mark 'git stash [message...]' as deprecated, Junio C Hamano, (Wed Nov 7, 1:02 am)
Re: [PATCH] Mark 'git stash [message...]' as deprecated, Wincent Colaiuta, (Wed Nov 7, 1:12 am)
Re: [PATCH] Mark 'git stash [message...]' as deprecated, Pierre Habouzit, (Wed Nov 7, 1:23 am)
Re: git pull opinion, Aghiles, (Wed Nov 7, 2:25 pm)
Re: git pull opinion, Johannes Schindelin, (Thu Nov 8, 8:27 am)
Re: git pull opinion, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Nov 9, 5:36 pm)