On Nov 15, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
quoted text > El 15/11/2007, a las 17:04, Brian Gernhardt escribi=F3:
>
>> On Nov 15, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
>>
>>> Was just running the test suite against the master branch and saw =20=
quoted text >>> that t9101 is currently failing on Leopard, and a review with git-=20=
quoted text >>> bisect indicates that it has been ever since it was first =20
>>> introduced (in commit 15153451). Not sure if this problem is =20
>>> Leopard-specific or not as I only have one machine.
>>
>> It is not a Leopard specific problem, as far as I can tell. I =20
>> just ran the test and had no errors on my Leopard machine. So =20
>> perhaps it's some other detail of your setup?
>>
>>> I'm not a git-svn user myself, but if there's anything I can do =20
>>> to help diagnose this problem further on Leopard please let me know.
>>
>> I just tested it using svn from fink and (after discovering it =20
>> exists) from Leopard. No problems. Do you have an old svn =20
>> package (client, admin, or perl binding) installed from Darwin =20
>> Ports or Fink perhaps?
>
> I don't use Darwin Ports or Fink, and this is a clean Leopard =20
> install (ie. nothing installed in /usr/local apart from git and a =20
> very small number of other tools that aren't related to Subversion).
>
> This is the output of "/usr/bin/svn --version":
>
> svn, version 1.4.4 (r25188)
> compiled Sep 23 2007, 22:32:34
>
> Perhaps then it is something in the environment.
Hi Wincent,
Can you reproduce this deterministically? If yes, can you re-run the =20=
test with the --verbose flag and post the gzipped output (or send it =20
to me if the list doesn't like this sort of attachment).
Thanks.
--=20
Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna
EPITA Research and Development Laboratory
