[PATCH] revert/cherry-pick: allow starting from dirty work tree.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <git@...>
Date: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 - 5:16 pm

There is no reason to forbid a dirty work tree when reverting or
cherry-picking a change, as long as the index is clean.

The scripted version used to allow it:

    case "$no_commit" in
    t)
    	# We do not intend to commit immediately.  We just want to
    	# merge the differences in.
    	head=$(git-write-tree) ||
    		die "Your index file is unmerged."
    	;;
    *)
    	head=$(git-rev-parse --verify HEAD) ||
    		die "You do not have a valid HEAD"
    	files=$(git-diff-index --cached --name-only $head) || exit
    	if [ "$files" ]; then
    		die "Dirty index: cannot $me (dirty: $files)"
    	fi
    	;;
    esac

but C rewrite tightened the check, probably by mistake.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
 builtin-revert.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin-revert.c b/builtin-revert.c
index cef7147..f704197 100644
--- a/builtin-revert.c
+++ b/builtin-revert.c
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static int revert_or_cherry_pick(int argc, const char **argv)
 		if (get_sha1("HEAD", head))
 			die ("You do not have a valid HEAD");
 		wt_status_prepare(&s);
-		if (s.commitable || s.workdir_dirty)
+		if (s.commitable)
 			die ("Dirty index: cannot %s", me);
 		discard_cache();
 	}
-- 
1.5.3.5.1728.g34b3e

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] revert/cherry-pick: allow starting from dirty work t..., Junio C Hamano, (Tue Nov 13, 5:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] revert/cherry-pick: allow starting from dirty wo..., Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Nov 13, 7:37 pm)