Re: Cloning from kernel.org, then switching to another repo

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@...>, Git Mailing List <git@...>
Date: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 - 12:14 am

On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:28:28PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:


Yep, the http fetch code doesn't understand about fetching parts of
packs (there was some discussion about using partial HTTP transfers, but
nobody seems to have cared enough to implement it).


Yes, it should. The goal is to not put your changes and the upstream
commits in the same pack. You could also push _just_ the upstream
commits first, then in a different push, send your local changes. But
when they get pushed together, they all end up in the same pack.

-Peff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Cloning from kernel.org, then switching to another repo, Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Nov 12, 10:13 am)
Re: Cloning from kernel.org, then switching to another repo, Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Nov 12, 4:42 pm)
Re: Cloning from kernel.org, then switching to another repo, Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Nov 12, 12:16 pm)
Re: Cloning from kernel.org, then switching to another repo, Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Nov 12, 12:36 pm)
Re: Cloning from kernel.org, then switching to another repo, Jeff King, (Tue Nov 13, 12:14 am)