Re: Trying to use git-filter-branch to compress history by removing large, obsolete binary files

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...>
Cc: Elijah Newren <newren@...>, Frank Lichtenheld <frank@...>, <git@...>
Date: Sunday, October 7, 2007 - 9:06 pm

Hi,

On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, J. Bruce Fields wrote:


The rationale was this: filter-branch recently learnt how to rewrite many 
branches, and it might be tedious to find out which ones.  But then, there 
is git log --no-walk --all, so maybe I really should get rid of 
refs/original/*?

I'd like to have some comments from the heavier filter-branch users on 
that...

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Trying to use git-filter-branch to compress history by r..., Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Oct 7, 7:19 pm)
Re: Trying to use git-filter-branch to compress history by r..., Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Oct 7, 7:28 pm)
Re: Trying to use git-filter-branch to compress history by r..., Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Oct 7, 8:34 pm)
Re: Trying to use git-filter-branch to compress history by r..., Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Oct 7, 9:06 pm)
Re: Trying to use git-filter-branch to compress history by r..., Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Oct 9, 6:37 am)