Side note - none of the repos I use are likely to actually have any
quoting as an issue, so in that sense I don't actually care. I'd never
notice if git did any quoting or not.
What I care about - and where I entered the discussion - is that the real
impetus for this *stupid* quoting is not the actual need for quoting in
itself (which doesn't seem to exist), but because people want to extend
the repository naming to contain other things too, in particular the
broken cogito single-branch naming thing.
So I could care less about some detail that I'll never even notice, if it
wasn't for the fact that there's all this other baggage that goes with
this whole thing. So the quoting itself is more of a symptom of the real
problem.
Guess what? I didn't make the config file follow any Windows INI standards
either. I'm just waiting for the first person to point out that you cannot
parse a .gitconfig file with standard INI parsers.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html