also sprach Alejandro Martinez Ruiz <alex@flawedcode.org> [2007.10.31.2216 =
+0100]:
quoted text
> So how about an "undo" command or a switch for revert with a special
> meaning like "hey, this one is a nice commit, but it ain't ready yet,
> I'd like you to ignore I ever committed the thing when merging or
> rebasing again, thanks"?

Revert does exactly that, by reverting the content. That's all Git
cares about. Does

  http://lists-archives.org/git/634475-unmerging-feature-branches.html

make it clear?

--=20
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
=20
"getting a scsi chain working is perfectly simple if you remember that
 there must be exactly three terminations: one on one end of the
 cable, one on the far end, and the goat, terminated over the scsi
 chain with a silver-handled knife whilst burning *black* candles."
                                                     -- anthony deboer
=20
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net