On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Martin Langhoff wrote:
quoted text
> 
> Having something functionally similar to
> 
>   cg-clone git://foo.tld/bar.git#blue
> 
> would save a few steps -- and some potential confusion -- for projects
> using GIT.

I do agree with that "functionally similar", I just disagree with the 
syntax.

The thing is, we don't want a single branch name. Not for clone, not for 
fetch, not for pull, and not for push.

Yes, a single branch may be one common case, but it's definitely not the 
only one, and it's fundamentally the wrong thing to use as a definition of 
syntax. 

It's also the wrong thing to do for local stuff.

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html